What might indicate a need for a forklift operator to undergo re-evaluation?

The selection indicating notable struggles with safety protocols is correct because safety is paramount in forklift operation. If an operator is having difficulty adhering to safety protocols, it can lead to serious accidents, injuries, or damage to property. A re-evaluation in this context can help identify specific areas of concern, ensuring that the operator receives additional training or support needed to improve their skills and ensure a safe working environment.

High performance, while a positive indication of skill, does not necessitate re-evaluation; rather, it suggests proficiency. Similarly, the emergence of new technology might prompt the need for training, but it does not directly correlate with an individual's ability to operate a forklift safely. Lastly, low usage frequency doesn’t imply a lack of capability; it merely indicates how often the operator is required to use the equipment. Thus, the primary concern for re-evaluation should always focus on safety competency, making notable struggles with safety protocols a critical reason to reassess an operator's skills.